Anyone in the market for small javelin heads for a peltast or similar impression is not spoiled for choice at the moment. Personally I find most javelin heads are big enough to be spearheads, while large arrowheads still have small sockets that would tend to result in shafts breaking off in the socket when used as javelins (which I've unfortunately confirmed firsthand).
If you prefer a lighter javelin and want to carry more than one or two, I believe Lord of Battle's Medieval leaf-bladed javelin is the best non-custom middle ground I've been able to find so far. They retail direct from the manufacturer for 24.99USD.
Trio of Lord of Battles Medieval leaf-bladed javelin heads. Note the angled cut of the middle socket and the bend of the lowermost blade.
I bought three late last year but have only just gotten around to reviewing them. As before, Lord of Battle's quality control isn't spectacular. Two of the points have edges that become very thick toward the point. They're not safety javelins that could be used for reenactment combat, but on the other hand they'd require a lot of sharpening to use as real weapons. The point with the thinner edges also has a blade that's slightly but obviously curved out-of-plane with the socket. I'm not sure whether I want to try bending it straight in a vise; I have no idea how hard the steel is or whether bending it cold would cause some kind of micro-damage. Lastly, one of the straight blades has a socket that's cut at a noticeable angle. The point should still be straight when installed, all other things being equal, but it's a little odd-looking and will require a little extra care if you like to cut a tenon into shafts so that the sides of the shaft are flush with the socket (the sockets are about 3/4 inch or 19mm wide on the outside). As an aside, note that the sockets all have two 1/8 inch (3.175mm) rivet holes.
The QC is, on the other hand, better than in some of Lord of Battle's products. The blades are a more consistent shape than their older small spear/javelin heads, as you can see here, and the finish is much better, especially for the price. (The product that seems to have replaced the small spear/javelin head, the current "light" spear head, is larger than the older model and requires a thicker shaft, thus moving it out of this size category.) As for the old medium spearhead, there's no comparison.
Size specifications: The bent point is 6-1/4 inches or just under 159mm long, has a blade 1 inch (25mm) wide, and weighs a little more than 3 ounces (85g). The one with the angled socket is 6-5/16 inches (160mm) measured from one side and 6-3/8 inches (162mm) from the other, 15/16 inch (just under 24mm) wide, and weighs about 3-1/2 ounces (99g). The last one is 6-5/16 inches long, 1 inch wide, and weighs a bit more than 3-1/2 ounces. All three have sockets with an inner diameter of 5/8 inch (just under 16mm).
On the whole, I would give this one a tentative recommendation; it's far from perfect but it's still decent, and I don't know of any other small javelin head that won't run you the price of custom metalwork.
A guide to the Achaemenid Persian empire for reenactors, focusing on the Graeco-Persian Wars period. A quick guide to Persian history, society, religion, military, clothing and culture, plus links to reenactment groups and commemorations of the 2,500th anniversary of the Graeco-Persian Wars.
Showing posts with label javelin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label javelin. Show all posts
Monday, January 29, 2024
Saturday, March 26, 2022
Polishing rough-finished steel
As noted in my previous post, many spearheads come from the factor with a coarsely ground and blackened finish. This may be a cost-saving measure, but it's rather unappealing, especially if other your other steel items are already polished. Here I'm going to try to give a better finish to the AntiqueCraftsShop javelin heads.
I'm starting it on a mini belt sander I recently got on eBay. Sanding belts used for metal quickly acquire a smooth feel that belies the actual grit (size gradient of the sand) and are permeated with fine metal dust, so they should be kept separate from those used for wood and other materials.
The slightly hollow-ground faces can be sanded with a slow back-and-forth movement over an axle. If they were a flat diamond grind, I would press the faces against the belt where it runs over the supporting metal shelf. (This can be done to thin down the secondary bevels, though, since the angle needed to do so means the medial ridge is well clear of the belt.) Care is needed at this stage not to mess up the medial ridge. Once it's done, I turn the edges parallel to the belt sander to clean up any hints of unevenness created during this step.
Safety notes: For some reason this sander's belt is set up to move toward the motor and up from the sanding ledge. Also, of course, I am only holding the spearhead in one hand to snap the photo; you should always hold anything you are sanding in two hands whenever it's in contact with the belt, not only for safety but also because holding it in one hand often just doesn't work. And, of course, wear safety goggles whenever using any power tools that grind, cut or drill. I like chemical splash goggles that wrap against the face, making sure no metal fragments can get in my eyes again.
Sanding on top of the shelf allows you to press down hard on flat or convex surfaces, useful when trying to get rid of deep pits and grind marks. Moving convex surfaces to the gap between the axle and shelf allows the belt to wrap slightly around the surface, giving a more even finish.
After polishing to 60 (top), 150 (middle) and 600 grit.
Some of the sandpapers used to give the final hand polish. For this step I am tending to wrap the sandpaper around the back of one finger and use the other hand to rub the spear across it, following the alignment of the the scratches created by the belt sander. With the blade faces, it's very difficult to follow the sander's marks. I tend to instead just pinch the paper around the faces with my fingertips and rub the paper parallel to the blade; much easier, though not as effective.
The finished spearheads both illustrate the importance of using as many grades of grit as possible. Each grade is able to remove grind marks from a slightly coarser grit, while creating new marks of its own, until you're using a grit so fine that its marks are undetectable to the eye (achieving the so-called mirror polish). The spearhead on the left was initially polished with the 600-grit belt before moving on to finer grades of paper for hand-polishing. As a result, it still has lots of grind marks and pits with black scale that the belt was unable to reach or remove. The one on the right, which started on a 60-grit belt, has almost none of the factory marks left, but the jump from 150 to 600-grit left lots of marks from the 150-grit that the 600-grit belt didn't deal with. These are visible not as black scratches but as bright, sparkly ones. I'm not sure which one I dislike more. Either way, the conclusion is clear: I need to buy more stuff.
I'm starting it on a mini belt sander I recently got on eBay. Sanding belts used for metal quickly acquire a smooth feel that belies the actual grit (size gradient of the sand) and are permeated with fine metal dust, so they should be kept separate from those used for wood and other materials.
The slightly hollow-ground faces can be sanded with a slow back-and-forth movement over an axle. If they were a flat diamond grind, I would press the faces against the belt where it runs over the supporting metal shelf. (This can be done to thin down the secondary bevels, though, since the angle needed to do so means the medial ridge is well clear of the belt.) Care is needed at this stage not to mess up the medial ridge. Once it's done, I turn the edges parallel to the belt sander to clean up any hints of unevenness created during this step.
Safety notes: For some reason this sander's belt is set up to move toward the motor and up from the sanding ledge. Also, of course, I am only holding the spearhead in one hand to snap the photo; you should always hold anything you are sanding in two hands whenever it's in contact with the belt, not only for safety but also because holding it in one hand often just doesn't work. And, of course, wear safety goggles whenever using any power tools that grind, cut or drill. I like chemical splash goggles that wrap against the face, making sure no metal fragments can get in my eyes again.
Sanding on top of the shelf allows you to press down hard on flat or convex surfaces, useful when trying to get rid of deep pits and grind marks. Moving convex surfaces to the gap between the axle and shelf allows the belt to wrap slightly around the surface, giving a more even finish.
After polishing to 60 (top), 150 (middle) and 600 grit.
Some of the sandpapers used to give the final hand polish. For this step I am tending to wrap the sandpaper around the back of one finger and use the other hand to rub the spear across it, following the alignment of the the scratches created by the belt sander. With the blade faces, it's very difficult to follow the sander's marks. I tend to instead just pinch the paper around the faces with my fingertips and rub the paper parallel to the blade; much easier, though not as effective.
The finished spearheads both illustrate the importance of using as many grades of grit as possible. Each grade is able to remove grind marks from a slightly coarser grit, while creating new marks of its own, until you're using a grit so fine that its marks are undetectable to the eye (achieving the so-called mirror polish). The spearhead on the left was initially polished with the 600-grit belt before moving on to finer grades of paper for hand-polishing. As a result, it still has lots of grind marks and pits with black scale that the belt was unable to reach or remove. The one on the right, which started on a 60-grit belt, has almost none of the factory marks left, but the jump from 150 to 600-grit left lots of marks from the 150-grit that the 600-grit belt didn't deal with. These are visible not as black scratches but as bright, sparkly ones. I'm not sure which one I dislike more. Either way, the conclusion is clear: I need to buy more stuff.
Monday, February 29, 2016
Deve Hüyük - the full catalogue
Following Friday's post, I found Roger Moorey's catalogue of finds. It was embarrassingly easy and I don't know why my earlier searches didn't turn it up, but here goes anyway. Although most of what's shown is in the form of line drawings, it's still a rich gallery of objects common to our time period.
An important note on time periods: The site as a whole comprises several phases. Deve Hüyük I seems to be Neo-Assyrian, while Deve Hüyük II is Achaemenid. There's also a few Arsacid-period graves in phase II; these are termed Deve Hüyük III. Therefore if you're interested in any particular object, you need to confirm which phase it belongs to.
Moorey states, on the basis of the long sword and hilt fragments from Persepolis (see OIP #69), that the flanged dagger was used throughout the Achaemenid period. He also lends some credence to something I've long suspected, that this dagger is the same as the "Elamite" dagger worn by robe-clad Persians and Elamites in period art.
There's a lot of highly decorated pottery, including several "flasks" shaped like pointed amphorae but without handles. A canteen broadly similar to the ones from Persepolis but slightly different in detail is here described as a "pilgrim flask," while another, highly decorated glazed one is considered to be of Egyptian influence.
Those looking to add more flare to high-class impressions may look to the variety of bronze bracelets, anklets, rings and earrings, many of which should be simple to fabricate from metal rod or strips with annealing and filing. Beads of all sorts of materials appear, as well as small, ceramic human head and animal pendants.
Among toiletries are a pair of tweezers, several circular bronze mirrors, and tubes and applicator sticks for kohl, a kind of eyeliner. The kohl tubes and sticks are not necessarily feminine accessories, as Xenophon claims that Astyages, like other Median men, wore "pencillings beneath his eyes." (Some of the attached codes may clarify this but I'm only skimming for the time being.)
Achaemenid bronze bowls, rhytons, iron akinakai, sagarides, arrowheads, tanged javelin heads, a second gorytos cover decoration, snaffle bits, arm fibulae and cylinder seals mostly reinforce what we already know. One socketed trilobate arrowhead is attached to a bronze chain for some reason, and most of the spearheads run to proportionally rather narrow, though they may have corroded at the edges. There's also a bronze bell described as a horse fitting.
An important note on time periods: The site as a whole comprises several phases. Deve Hüyük I seems to be Neo-Assyrian, while Deve Hüyük II is Achaemenid. There's also a few Arsacid-period graves in phase II; these are termed Deve Hüyük III. Therefore if you're interested in any particular object, you need to confirm which phase it belongs to.
Moorey states, on the basis of the long sword and hilt fragments from Persepolis (see OIP #69), that the flanged dagger was used throughout the Achaemenid period. He also lends some credence to something I've long suspected, that this dagger is the same as the "Elamite" dagger worn by robe-clad Persians and Elamites in period art.
There's a lot of highly decorated pottery, including several "flasks" shaped like pointed amphorae but without handles. A canteen broadly similar to the ones from Persepolis but slightly different in detail is here described as a "pilgrim flask," while another, highly decorated glazed one is considered to be of Egyptian influence.
Those looking to add more flare to high-class impressions may look to the variety of bronze bracelets, anklets, rings and earrings, many of which should be simple to fabricate from metal rod or strips with annealing and filing. Beads of all sorts of materials appear, as well as small, ceramic human head and animal pendants.
Among toiletries are a pair of tweezers, several circular bronze mirrors, and tubes and applicator sticks for kohl, a kind of eyeliner. The kohl tubes and sticks are not necessarily feminine accessories, as Xenophon claims that Astyages, like other Median men, wore "pencillings beneath his eyes." (Some of the attached codes may clarify this but I'm only skimming for the time being.)
Achaemenid bronze bowls, rhytons, iron akinakai, sagarides, arrowheads, tanged javelin heads, a second gorytos cover decoration, snaffle bits, arm fibulae and cylinder seals mostly reinforce what we already know. One socketed trilobate arrowhead is attached to a bronze chain for some reason, and most of the spearheads run to proportionally rather narrow, though they may have corroded at the edges. There's also a bronze bell described as a horse fitting.
Labels:
accessories,
akinakes,
arrowheads,
axe,
bracelet,
canteen,
deve huyuk,
deve hüyük,
elamite dagger,
fibula,
gorytos,
horse tack,
javelin,
jewelry,
mirror,
pottery,
rhyton,
sagaris,
sword,
weapons
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Peoples of the empire: The Thracians
This is the final entry in the "Peoples of the empire" series.
Geographical definition
Thrace (Gk. Thrāikē, probably O.P. Skudra) was located in the eastern Balkans, covering most of southern Bulgaria from the Black Sea coast inward, the northeastern corner of modern Greece and European Turkey (that part of the country north of the Sea of Marmara and its strait). Thracians were also to be found in Macedonia and other parts of the Balkans, Anatolia and as far east as western Scythia.
History
According to Leo Klejn, the Thracians originated with the multi-cordoned ware culture at the turn of the second millennium BC, which was pushed west from its native Ukraine by the expanding timber grave culture (widely believed to be proto-Scythian).
Settling west of the Black Sea, the Thracians remained divided into several tribes in Herodotus' day. Like the Celts in western Europe, they lived mostly in small fortified villages. Towns such as Byzantium were mainly the domain of Greek colonists in the Archaic period. The Thracians did, however, become very widespread; Herodotus thought them the largest nation in the world second to the Indians, but weak because of their disunity.
In or about 513, Darius the Great sent his general Megabazus to conquer Thrace. What happened on the expedition is not described in detail, but Herodotus says that Megabazus passed from place to place and conquered each tribe in turn.
The Persian hold over the area appears to have been weak. In 492, during his punitive expedition against the Greeks following the Ionian Revolt, Mardonius was attacked by Bryges (a tribe of Thrace thought to be related to the Phrygians) while camped in Macedon.
Thracians called Bithynians, who dwelt just on the Anatolian side of the Bosporus, marched as infantry in Xerxes' invasion of Greece under Bassaces son of Artabanus. These were part of the satrapy of Phrygia. Some of them were retained by Mardonius for his reduced force, and may have fought at Plataea.
Herodotus reports that Thracians north of Greece carried off the sacred chariot Xerxes had left in the city of Siris when he was marching forth. The king of the Bisaltae tribe refused to ally himself with the great king, and when his six sons followed the Persians regardless and then came home, their father had them blinded. Some of Mardonius' men who survived Plataea were also killed by European Thracians as Artabazus led them toward Byzantium.
Herodotus described the Thracians as having similar customs, "save the Getae, the Trausi, and those who dwell above the Crestonaeans." The Getae (he says) believed that they did not die, but were called as messengers to their god Salmoxis or Gebeleïzis. Every five years, a man would be chosen by lot to be killed as a messenger; he would be given whatever prayers the Getae wished to convey, then thrown into the air over three lances. If he did not die, they judged him an unfit messenger and chose again.
The Trausi believed that to live was to suffer, and lamented births like other peoples lamented deaths (which honestly makes me think of a kind of evil eye superstition), but when a person died, the funeral celebrated their release from suffering. "Those who dwell above the Crestonaeans" were polygynists whose widows competed for the honor of being the one to be slain and buried with her husband.
Other Thracian tribes, the historian reports, would make lamentation and sacrifice at funerals, then cremate the dead or bury them in mounds, holding funeral games afterward. They sold their children; husbands bought wives for a bride price and strictly coveted them, but unmarried women's chastity was not considered important. Tattooing was an honor restricted to nobles, and warriors were held in the highest regard, farmers in the lowest.
Teres I (r. 460-445) and his son Sitalces (r. 431-424), of the Odrysae, united the tribes of the European Thracians in the mid-fifth century. Although this union was unstable and the Odrysian rulers' political power far from absolute, they were regarded by foreigners as the kings of Thrace. In 429, Sitalces allied with Athens and invaded Macedon, though had to retreat late in the year because of logistical problems. This was the beginning of a complex political and military interplay between Thrace, Athens and Macedon lasting into the reign of Philip II.
The Odrysian kings adopted much Greek culture, including clothing and weapons, and used the Greek language for administration. The kingdom reached its zenith in the first few decades; at the turn of the fourth century it broke into eastern, central and western dominions. During the revolt of Ariobarzanes in or around 366, Cotys I took the opportunity to invade the Thracian Chersonese (modern Gallipoli), which was then held by Athens. Cotys conquered the peninsula by 359, and concluded an alliance with Philip II of Macedon, but was murdered the following year by two students of Plato. In 357 the Athenians retook the Chersonese.
Cotys' kingdom was divided between his son Cersobleptes in the east and two other princes, Berisades in the west and Amadocus II in central Thrace; these may have also been sons of Cotys. Cersobleptes' Greek mercenary Charidemus was able to negotiate some kind of concession from Athens (the nature of which is uncertain but seems to have related to the Chersonese) which resulted in the breaking of Thrace's alliance with Macedon.
In 352, Berisades died and was succeeded by his son Cetriporis. Cersobleptes tried to disinherit him, but the Thracians also had to deal with Macedonian incursions that year, when Philip took a son of Cersobleptes hostage. In 347 Philip forced all the Thracian kings to acknowledge Macedonian suzerainty. The next year, Philip seems to have returned to fight Cersobleptes, who nonetheless resumed attacks on Greek cities on the Hellespont afterward. Philip invaded Thrace yet again in 343 to bring Cersobleptes to terms. In the late 340s, Philip finally managed to reduce European Thrace to a tributary of Macedon.
Upon Philip's assassination in 336, the Triballi tribe allied with the Illyrians and rebelled against the Macedonians, at the same time as many other subjects. Alexander fought and defeated the Triballi in the Balkan Mountains the next year, then crossed the Danube and skirmished with the Getae. Thereafter the other Thracian tribes submitted to Alexander.
The Bithynians, meanwhile, seem to have set themselves up as an independent state under King Bas (r. 376-326) late in the Achaemenid period. After the Granicus and Alexander's appointment of his general Calas as satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia, Calas tried to conquer Bithynia but failed.
Thracians presumably of Europe took part in Alexander's expedition into Asia, fighting as cavalry at Gaugamela in 331. That year, Seuthes III became king of Thrace. Following the death of Zopyrion, Seuthes declared independence in 325. His rebellion was put down by Antipater, but he rebelled again in 323 after Thrace was given to Lysimachus in the Partition of Babylon. In 320, he founded the new capital Seuthopolis (modern Kazanluk in central Bulgaria). When Lysimachus came into conflict with Antigonus during the Wars of the Diadochi, Seuthes allied himself with Antigonus, but was again defeated in 313. The Odrysian kingship continued thereafter under the suzerainty various Hellenistic kingdoms and then under the Romans until the death of Rhoemetalces III in AD 46. As Rhoemetalces apparently had no heirs, Thrace was thereafter made a Roman province. As such, the region became culturally Romanized; the Thracian language is believed to have become extinct by the fifth century AD.
Bithynia remained independent during the Hellenistic period, and Bas' grandson Nicomedes founded its new capital at Nicomedia, where it would last until the Pontians drove Nicomedes IV out in 90 BC. He was restored to his throne by the Romans six years later and Bithynia became effectively a Roman client state, which Nicomedes officially bequeathed to Rome on his death in 74. All the royals of Bithynia toward the end have Greek names and it seems likely that Bithynia became linguistically Hellenized during this time.
Language
Too little of Thracian from the Classical period and earlier has been preserved to hope to speak it with any fluency. The surviving corpus consists of some names, a handful of words from Greek texts, and only four, very short inscriptions. It was clearly Indo-European but its classification is not certain. It's usually placed along with Dacian (which some linguists regard as a branch of Thracian) in the Daco-Thracian branch. Daco-Thracian may be part of a larger Thraco-Illyrian branch, or Thracian and Illyrian may form a Sprachbund.
Religion
Thracians were polytheists. Among their chief gods was Sabazios, apparently the same deity worshipped by the Phrygians. The artistic representation of Sabazios and similar-looking gods is called the "Thracian horseman," and seems to have been adopted in later centuries to represent Saint George. The war goddess Cotys was widely celebrated at the Cotyttia festival, which involved going into the hills at night and getting drunk. A cult of Cotys existed in Athens, where she was identified with Persephone. Other recorded Thracian deities included Zibelthiurdos, whom the Greeks also identified with Zeus due to his association with lightning, and Bendis, a huntress identified with Artemis. The Greek deities Semele and Dionysus may also have had Thracian roots.
The Getae worshipped a god called Salmoxis or Zalmoxis, whom Herodotus says was a deified human who had taught that humans do not die, but pass to a land of eternal happiness. He also claims that the Getae believed in no god other than Salmoxis. These statements have been the subject of much interest among researchers who have interpreted it to mean that Getae were monotheists and "proto-Christians" whose native beliefs facilitated a transition to Christianity.
Clothing
Thracians wore belted, sleeveless or short-sleeved tunics, cloaks, laced boots and pointed tiaras. The bold embroidery of Thracian cloaks (which in some illustrations appear kidney-shaped rather than square) is well-illustrated in Greek pottery. According to Herodotus, their boots were deerskin and their hats were fox skin, though I would consider felt acceptable for the latter.
The boots were of a surprisingly modern laced design and could come up to the mid-calf, with downturned, dagged tops. I've seen some reenactors use Minnetonka knee-high boots. In times past these had the same crepe sole as the little ankle-high's I bought in 2011, but their website now seems to show them with a different design that hopefully will prove more durable. They're also stitched up on the sides and seem less likely to admit sand, though this comes at the expense of a moc-style toe which is not correct for Thracian impressions. Also they're made of the same suede as the ankle boots, which will pick up dust quickly if you use them on the beach. Nonetheless, these are probably the best non-custom option out there.
The "Skudra" at Naqš-e Rostam wears a Scythian coat. I can think of a number of explanations for this, but I think artwork has been consistent enough elsewhere that it's best to stick to simple tunics.
Weapons
The best-known Thracian weapon is the javelin, which seems to have used a spearhead of size and shape comparable to a thrusting spear, but on a shorter, thinner shaft. Some also had longer spears, so reenacting as a Thracian doesn't limit you to a missile troop role.
Thracians used a distinctive short sword or large knife similar to a smaller version of a falcata. In Hellenistic times it came to be known as a sica, and later Roman "Thraex" gladiators were armed with a weapon based on it which resembled a crooked gladius. According to Xenophon, Thynians (apparently cousins of the Bithynians) carried clubs, which he claimed were intended to knock the heads off spears.
The famous Thracian shield was the pelta, which was made in both round and crescent shapes, the latter of which was apparently very similar to the crescent shields of West and Central Asia. Conventional wisdom nowadays is that they were made of sticks woven vertically through a sheet of leather or rawhide, like the Persian rectangular shields and smaller Scythian ones, but militating against this is the fact that in Greek art they are frequently shown with designs on the front which would work best if the front were a smooth, solid surface. I have seen a few people put forth that wood plank construction would have been common in heavily forested areas like Thrace, while the stick-and-hide construction would more likely prevail in the grassy steppes (ex.: the Pazyryk finds and Solokha comb) even if the shape were the same.
Several grip systems for the pelta are shown in Greek art: Most commonly, a handgrip near the rim was combined with some kind of central arm grip, either similar in shape to a porpax or simply a pair of crossed bands. There are other instances where two non-crossed central bands are used as the grips, pinched together in one hand, like the grips of a sipar or dhal. In a few cases it appears that a single central grip was used, but this system gives less stability than the double grips.
The famous Thracian infantry called peltasts carried the pelta shield and a spear or several javelins. Peltasts were versatile; their javelineers were missile troops, but due to their shields, both spear- and javelin-armed peltasts had an advantage in melee over missile troops who had no shields, while still being more mobile than hoplites in phalanx.
Osprey writer Christopher Webber claims that Thracians in the fourth century started wearing helmets. They were apparently of the Phrygian type, with attached cheek guards giving them a fleeting resemblance to a Chalcidian helmet, but also having a tall curled peak similar to Thracian and Phrygian tiaras.
Geographical definition
Thrace (Gk. Thrāikē, probably O.P. Skudra) was located in the eastern Balkans, covering most of southern Bulgaria from the Black Sea coast inward, the northeastern corner of modern Greece and European Turkey (that part of the country north of the Sea of Marmara and its strait). Thracians were also to be found in Macedonia and other parts of the Balkans, Anatolia and as far east as western Scythia.
History
According to Leo Klejn, the Thracians originated with the multi-cordoned ware culture at the turn of the second millennium BC, which was pushed west from its native Ukraine by the expanding timber grave culture (widely believed to be proto-Scythian).
Settling west of the Black Sea, the Thracians remained divided into several tribes in Herodotus' day. Like the Celts in western Europe, they lived mostly in small fortified villages. Towns such as Byzantium were mainly the domain of Greek colonists in the Archaic period. The Thracians did, however, become very widespread; Herodotus thought them the largest nation in the world second to the Indians, but weak because of their disunity.
In or about 513, Darius the Great sent his general Megabazus to conquer Thrace. What happened on the expedition is not described in detail, but Herodotus says that Megabazus passed from place to place and conquered each tribe in turn.
The Persian hold over the area appears to have been weak. In 492, during his punitive expedition against the Greeks following the Ionian Revolt, Mardonius was attacked by Bryges (a tribe of Thrace thought to be related to the Phrygians) while camped in Macedon.
Thracians called Bithynians, who dwelt just on the Anatolian side of the Bosporus, marched as infantry in Xerxes' invasion of Greece under Bassaces son of Artabanus. These were part of the satrapy of Phrygia. Some of them were retained by Mardonius for his reduced force, and may have fought at Plataea.
Herodotus reports that Thracians north of Greece carried off the sacred chariot Xerxes had left in the city of Siris when he was marching forth. The king of the Bisaltae tribe refused to ally himself with the great king, and when his six sons followed the Persians regardless and then came home, their father had them blinded. Some of Mardonius' men who survived Plataea were also killed by European Thracians as Artabazus led them toward Byzantium.
Herodotus described the Thracians as having similar customs, "save the Getae, the Trausi, and those who dwell above the Crestonaeans." The Getae (he says) believed that they did not die, but were called as messengers to their god Salmoxis or Gebeleïzis. Every five years, a man would be chosen by lot to be killed as a messenger; he would be given whatever prayers the Getae wished to convey, then thrown into the air over three lances. If he did not die, they judged him an unfit messenger and chose again.
The Trausi believed that to live was to suffer, and lamented births like other peoples lamented deaths (which honestly makes me think of a kind of evil eye superstition), but when a person died, the funeral celebrated their release from suffering. "Those who dwell above the Crestonaeans" were polygynists whose widows competed for the honor of being the one to be slain and buried with her husband.
Other Thracian tribes, the historian reports, would make lamentation and sacrifice at funerals, then cremate the dead or bury them in mounds, holding funeral games afterward. They sold their children; husbands bought wives for a bride price and strictly coveted them, but unmarried women's chastity was not considered important. Tattooing was an honor restricted to nobles, and warriors were held in the highest regard, farmers in the lowest.
Teres I (r. 460-445) and his son Sitalces (r. 431-424), of the Odrysae, united the tribes of the European Thracians in the mid-fifth century. Although this union was unstable and the Odrysian rulers' political power far from absolute, they were regarded by foreigners as the kings of Thrace. In 429, Sitalces allied with Athens and invaded Macedon, though had to retreat late in the year because of logistical problems. This was the beginning of a complex political and military interplay between Thrace, Athens and Macedon lasting into the reign of Philip II.
The Odrysian kings adopted much Greek culture, including clothing and weapons, and used the Greek language for administration. The kingdom reached its zenith in the first few decades; at the turn of the fourth century it broke into eastern, central and western dominions. During the revolt of Ariobarzanes in or around 366, Cotys I took the opportunity to invade the Thracian Chersonese (modern Gallipoli), which was then held by Athens. Cotys conquered the peninsula by 359, and concluded an alliance with Philip II of Macedon, but was murdered the following year by two students of Plato. In 357 the Athenians retook the Chersonese.
Cotys' kingdom was divided between his son Cersobleptes in the east and two other princes, Berisades in the west and Amadocus II in central Thrace; these may have also been sons of Cotys. Cersobleptes' Greek mercenary Charidemus was able to negotiate some kind of concession from Athens (the nature of which is uncertain but seems to have related to the Chersonese) which resulted in the breaking of Thrace's alliance with Macedon.
In 352, Berisades died and was succeeded by his son Cetriporis. Cersobleptes tried to disinherit him, but the Thracians also had to deal with Macedonian incursions that year, when Philip took a son of Cersobleptes hostage. In 347 Philip forced all the Thracian kings to acknowledge Macedonian suzerainty. The next year, Philip seems to have returned to fight Cersobleptes, who nonetheless resumed attacks on Greek cities on the Hellespont afterward. Philip invaded Thrace yet again in 343 to bring Cersobleptes to terms. In the late 340s, Philip finally managed to reduce European Thrace to a tributary of Macedon.
Upon Philip's assassination in 336, the Triballi tribe allied with the Illyrians and rebelled against the Macedonians, at the same time as many other subjects. Alexander fought and defeated the Triballi in the Balkan Mountains the next year, then crossed the Danube and skirmished with the Getae. Thereafter the other Thracian tribes submitted to Alexander.
The Bithynians, meanwhile, seem to have set themselves up as an independent state under King Bas (r. 376-326) late in the Achaemenid period. After the Granicus and Alexander's appointment of his general Calas as satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia, Calas tried to conquer Bithynia but failed.
Thracians presumably of Europe took part in Alexander's expedition into Asia, fighting as cavalry at Gaugamela in 331. That year, Seuthes III became king of Thrace. Following the death of Zopyrion, Seuthes declared independence in 325. His rebellion was put down by Antipater, but he rebelled again in 323 after Thrace was given to Lysimachus in the Partition of Babylon. In 320, he founded the new capital Seuthopolis (modern Kazanluk in central Bulgaria). When Lysimachus came into conflict with Antigonus during the Wars of the Diadochi, Seuthes allied himself with Antigonus, but was again defeated in 313. The Odrysian kingship continued thereafter under the suzerainty various Hellenistic kingdoms and then under the Romans until the death of Rhoemetalces III in AD 46. As Rhoemetalces apparently had no heirs, Thrace was thereafter made a Roman province. As such, the region became culturally Romanized; the Thracian language is believed to have become extinct by the fifth century AD.
Bithynia remained independent during the Hellenistic period, and Bas' grandson Nicomedes founded its new capital at Nicomedia, where it would last until the Pontians drove Nicomedes IV out in 90 BC. He was restored to his throne by the Romans six years later and Bithynia became effectively a Roman client state, which Nicomedes officially bequeathed to Rome on his death in 74. All the royals of Bithynia toward the end have Greek names and it seems likely that Bithynia became linguistically Hellenized during this time.
Language
Too little of Thracian from the Classical period and earlier has been preserved to hope to speak it with any fluency. The surviving corpus consists of some names, a handful of words from Greek texts, and only four, very short inscriptions. It was clearly Indo-European but its classification is not certain. It's usually placed along with Dacian (which some linguists regard as a branch of Thracian) in the Daco-Thracian branch. Daco-Thracian may be part of a larger Thraco-Illyrian branch, or Thracian and Illyrian may form a Sprachbund.
Religion
Thracians were polytheists. Among their chief gods was Sabazios, apparently the same deity worshipped by the Phrygians. The artistic representation of Sabazios and similar-looking gods is called the "Thracian horseman," and seems to have been adopted in later centuries to represent Saint George. The war goddess Cotys was widely celebrated at the Cotyttia festival, which involved going into the hills at night and getting drunk. A cult of Cotys existed in Athens, where she was identified with Persephone. Other recorded Thracian deities included Zibelthiurdos, whom the Greeks also identified with Zeus due to his association with lightning, and Bendis, a huntress identified with Artemis. The Greek deities Semele and Dionysus may also have had Thracian roots.
The Getae worshipped a god called Salmoxis or Zalmoxis, whom Herodotus says was a deified human who had taught that humans do not die, but pass to a land of eternal happiness. He also claims that the Getae believed in no god other than Salmoxis. These statements have been the subject of much interest among researchers who have interpreted it to mean that Getae were monotheists and "proto-Christians" whose native beliefs facilitated a transition to Christianity.
Clothing
Thracians wore belted, sleeveless or short-sleeved tunics, cloaks, laced boots and pointed tiaras. The bold embroidery of Thracian cloaks (which in some illustrations appear kidney-shaped rather than square) is well-illustrated in Greek pottery. According to Herodotus, their boots were deerskin and their hats were fox skin, though I would consider felt acceptable for the latter.
The boots were of a surprisingly modern laced design and could come up to the mid-calf, with downturned, dagged tops. I've seen some reenactors use Minnetonka knee-high boots. In times past these had the same crepe sole as the little ankle-high's I bought in 2011, but their website now seems to show them with a different design that hopefully will prove more durable. They're also stitched up on the sides and seem less likely to admit sand, though this comes at the expense of a moc-style toe which is not correct for Thracian impressions. Also they're made of the same suede as the ankle boots, which will pick up dust quickly if you use them on the beach. Nonetheless, these are probably the best non-custom option out there.
The "Skudra" at Naqš-e Rostam wears a Scythian coat. I can think of a number of explanations for this, but I think artwork has been consistent enough elsewhere that it's best to stick to simple tunics.
Weapons
The best-known Thracian weapon is the javelin, which seems to have used a spearhead of size and shape comparable to a thrusting spear, but on a shorter, thinner shaft. Some also had longer spears, so reenacting as a Thracian doesn't limit you to a missile troop role.
Thracians used a distinctive short sword or large knife similar to a smaller version of a falcata. In Hellenistic times it came to be known as a sica, and later Roman "Thraex" gladiators were armed with a weapon based on it which resembled a crooked gladius. According to Xenophon, Thynians (apparently cousins of the Bithynians) carried clubs, which he claimed were intended to knock the heads off spears.
The famous Thracian shield was the pelta, which was made in both round and crescent shapes, the latter of which was apparently very similar to the crescent shields of West and Central Asia. Conventional wisdom nowadays is that they were made of sticks woven vertically through a sheet of leather or rawhide, like the Persian rectangular shields and smaller Scythian ones, but militating against this is the fact that in Greek art they are frequently shown with designs on the front which would work best if the front were a smooth, solid surface. I have seen a few people put forth that wood plank construction would have been common in heavily forested areas like Thrace, while the stick-and-hide construction would more likely prevail in the grassy steppes (ex.: the Pazyryk finds and Solokha comb) even if the shape were the same.
Several grip systems for the pelta are shown in Greek art: Most commonly, a handgrip near the rim was combined with some kind of central arm grip, either similar in shape to a porpax or simply a pair of crossed bands. There are other instances where two non-crossed central bands are used as the grips, pinched together in one hand, like the grips of a sipar or dhal. In a few cases it appears that a single central grip was used, but this system gives less stability than the double grips.
The famous Thracian infantry called peltasts carried the pelta shield and a spear or several javelins. Peltasts were versatile; their javelineers were missile troops, but due to their shields, both spear- and javelin-armed peltasts had an advantage in melee over missile troops who had no shields, while still being more mobile than hoplites in phalanx.
Osprey writer Christopher Webber claims that Thracians in the fourth century started wearing helmets. They were apparently of the Phrygian type, with attached cheek guards giving them a fleeting resemblance to a Chalcidian helmet, but also having a tall curled peak similar to Thracian and Phrygian tiaras.
Labels:
bithynia,
bithynians,
chersonese,
getae,
history,
javelin,
odrysae,
odrysian kingdom,
pelta,
peltasts,
peoples of the empire,
shield,
sica,
skudra,
spear,
thrace,
thracia,
thracians,
thraike,
thrāikē
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Peoples of the empire: The Lycians
By rights, this week's update should be about the Libyans. However, I've run into the usual issue of the area being at the edge of the literate world in ancient times meaning that there is not sufficient information for anything like a comprehensive summary. Onward to better-documented lands.
Geographical definition
Lycia (Luwian Lukka via Greek Lykia) was centered around the Teke Peninsula, a rounded landmass on the southwestern coast of modern Turkey. It lay southeast of Caria. It was a poor hill country with little urbanization; the people were known mainly as herders and (in the Bronze Age) pirates.
History
Lycia first appears in Hittite records as a member of the Assuwa League in the late Bronze Age. With the Bronze Age collapse, the "Lukka lands" disappear for a time, but evidently survived as a traditional name and reappear with the Greek histories. While the natives continued to live mostly as shepherds, Rhodian Greeks colonized the coast, founding Phaselis in the east.
According to Herodotus, Cyrus sent Harpagus to reduce western Anatolia after conquering the Lydian empire. This happened after 547 BC. The failed defense of Xanthus in southern Lycia is famous; the men there were driven back, put all their families and property in the citadel, burned it down and then returned to the field where they fought to the death. Other conquests within Lycia are not mentioned and were probably less tenacious or even peaceful.
The new rulers (khñtawati) of Xanthus became the most important in Lycia; Lendering suggests that "the great king had appointed the Xanthian prince as representative of all Lycians, responsible for the payment of tribute." A stele discovered there in 1838 was apparently a monument to a son of Arppakhu and this led to the theory, widespread for a while but no longer accepted, that Harpagus was awarded the satrapy of Lycia and founded a "Harpagid dynasty."
In truth Lycia did not have its own satrap. It was grouped in the empire's first tax district, with Ionia, Magnesia, Aeolia, Caria, Milya and Pamphylia, paying 400 talents total. During this time, Persian influence began to appear in Lycian architecture, particularly elite tombs.
It is possible that fighting continued after the conquest. A Persepolis Fortification tablet from 509 mentions prisoners of war called Turmirla, which may be a rendering of the Lycian endonym Trm̃mili.
Nonetheless, Herodotus says that Lycia sent 50 ships to Xerxes' invasion in 480. He gives their endonym as Termilai (Lat. Termilae) and incorrectly believes them to be of Cretan descent. Among the officers to whom he attaches importance was a Cyberniscus, son of Sicas, who has often been interpreted as the commander of the Lycian contingent. We are not told what role they played in the war, but as sailors they would have been important and probably took part in both Artemisium and Salamis.
A further note on Cyberniscus: The phrase in Greek is Kuberniskos Sika, which Anthony Keen has proposed is a misreading of Kubernis Kossika, possibly a Greek rendering of the Lycian names Kuprili and Kheziga. The Lycian monarchy has been rather sketchily reconstructed for most of the Persian period.
At some point after the Peloponnesian phase of the wars, control of Lycia switched to the Delian League. The circumstances under which the empire lost Lycia are unknown. During the latter half of the fifth century, Greek cultural influence in Lycia became stronger: Cities grew, Lycians began to build Greek-style rock tombs and create bilingual inscriptions.
Lycia defected from the League during the Peloponnesian War. In 429, Athens sent General Melasander to reconquer Lycia, but Gergis (Lyc. Kheriga) of Xanthus defeated him. Soon, Lycia reverted to Persian influence, and Xanthus was able to conquer Telmessus, Lycia's westernmost major city.
During the Revolt of the Satraps, Pericles, a king of the southeastern Limyra, declared himself king of Lycia and drove out the Xanthian ruler Arttum̃para. Pericles is regarded as the last king of Lycia. After the revolt failed, the land once again reverted to the empire.
Alexander the Great marched through Lycia in the winter of 334-333 in his campaign to capture coastal cities, which were of strategic importance during the Persian-Macedonian war. He appointed his general Nearchus as rule of Lycia and Pamphylia. Telmessus, Lycia's westernmost city, revolted in 333 but Nearchus quelled it easily enough.
In 329, Nearchus was temporarily relieved of his post to join Alexander's eastern campaign. What followed at the Partition of Babylon after Alexander's death is somewhat unclear: Diodorus and Arrian say that Lycia and Pamphylia were given to Antigonus, but Justin says that they were given to Nearchus. From the Partition of Triparadiscus onward they were definitely with Antigonus.
Lycia changed hands several times during the Wars of the Diadochi. It spent its longest period under the Ptolemies, from 275-197, when it was briefly taken by the Seleucids, and finally came under the Roman sphere of influence as a result of the Syrian War, 192-188.
I can find no clear indication of what became of native Lycian culture, but it is reasonable to suppose that it faded under Greek influence over the Hellenistic period. Thereafter the nation would only be a traditional and administrative name.
Language
Lycian belonged to the Luwian subgroup of Anatolian, a major Indo-European branch. It was distinct from the Luwian language and first appears in inscriptions during the Achaemenid period. Two dialects are known, standard Lycian or Lycian A, and Milyan. It was written in the Lycian alphabet, derived from Greek but with additional letters for its unique sounds. The last inscription in Lycian dates to about 300 BC.
Naturally, Greek was also spoken in the coastal cities and gradually replaced Lycian throughout the country.
Religion
According to Annick Payne, Lycian religion is known mainly from epitaphs referring to various deities. The most well-known is the "mother of the gods" (˜eni mahanahi), whom the Greeks identified with Leto (called L˜at˜ai in Lycian). The major sanctuary near Xanthus known as the Letoon, dating from the sixth century, may have originally belonged to the Lycian deity before she was conflated with Leto.
Likewise, most written sources identify native deities with Greek ones: Trqqas with Zeus and Maliya with Athena. The names of Padrita (Aphrodite) and Ertemi (Artemis, of whom the theophoric name Erttimeli was borne by a governor of Xanthus) appear to indicate adoption of the Greek goddesses by the Lycians rather than conflation. In the fourth century, Lycians began to worship Apollo as part and parcel with Leto and Artemis; he may have absorbed a minor god named Natri.
Due to the nature of the texts, not much is known about Lycian religious practice, but they appear to have favored altars cut into living rock rather than constructed ones.
Clothing
Unfortunately, native clothing appears is not well-attested in Lycian art; most anthropomorphic art comes from Greek-dominated areas and thus reflects Greek clothing styles. The chiton and himation appear frequently in royal tombs. Certain Persian elements are seen here and there, like the kidaris. The so-called Harpy Tomb from Xanthus, dating approximately to Xerxes' invasion, shows women's dress as being very finely draped with voluminous sleeves or caped uppers and plain, stiff-looking circlets.
Weapons
Herodotus says that the Lycians "wore cuirasses and greaves, and carried cornel-wood bows and unfeathered arrows and javelins; goat-skins hung from their shoulders, and they wore on their heads caps crowned with feathers; they also had daggers and scimitars (drepana)" (VII.92). I know this isn't good historical practice, but offhand I find it extremely difficult to believe that anyone used arrows that were not fletched.
Graeco-Lycian art shows military equipment that is pretty much Greek in appearance.
Geographical definition
Lycia (Luwian Lukka via Greek Lykia) was centered around the Teke Peninsula, a rounded landmass on the southwestern coast of modern Turkey. It lay southeast of Caria. It was a poor hill country with little urbanization; the people were known mainly as herders and (in the Bronze Age) pirates.
History
Lycia first appears in Hittite records as a member of the Assuwa League in the late Bronze Age. With the Bronze Age collapse, the "Lukka lands" disappear for a time, but evidently survived as a traditional name and reappear with the Greek histories. While the natives continued to live mostly as shepherds, Rhodian Greeks colonized the coast, founding Phaselis in the east.
According to Herodotus, Cyrus sent Harpagus to reduce western Anatolia after conquering the Lydian empire. This happened after 547 BC. The failed defense of Xanthus in southern Lycia is famous; the men there were driven back, put all their families and property in the citadel, burned it down and then returned to the field where they fought to the death. Other conquests within Lycia are not mentioned and were probably less tenacious or even peaceful.
The new rulers (khñtawati) of Xanthus became the most important in Lycia; Lendering suggests that "the great king had appointed the Xanthian prince as representative of all Lycians, responsible for the payment of tribute." A stele discovered there in 1838 was apparently a monument to a son of Arppakhu and this led to the theory, widespread for a while but no longer accepted, that Harpagus was awarded the satrapy of Lycia and founded a "Harpagid dynasty."
In truth Lycia did not have its own satrap. It was grouped in the empire's first tax district, with Ionia, Magnesia, Aeolia, Caria, Milya and Pamphylia, paying 400 talents total. During this time, Persian influence began to appear in Lycian architecture, particularly elite tombs.
It is possible that fighting continued after the conquest. A Persepolis Fortification tablet from 509 mentions prisoners of war called Turmirla, which may be a rendering of the Lycian endonym Trm̃mili.
Nonetheless, Herodotus says that Lycia sent 50 ships to Xerxes' invasion in 480. He gives their endonym as Termilai (Lat. Termilae) and incorrectly believes them to be of Cretan descent. Among the officers to whom he attaches importance was a Cyberniscus, son of Sicas, who has often been interpreted as the commander of the Lycian contingent. We are not told what role they played in the war, but as sailors they would have been important and probably took part in both Artemisium and Salamis.
A further note on Cyberniscus: The phrase in Greek is Kuberniskos Sika, which Anthony Keen has proposed is a misreading of Kubernis Kossika, possibly a Greek rendering of the Lycian names Kuprili and Kheziga. The Lycian monarchy has been rather sketchily reconstructed for most of the Persian period.
At some point after the Peloponnesian phase of the wars, control of Lycia switched to the Delian League. The circumstances under which the empire lost Lycia are unknown. During the latter half of the fifth century, Greek cultural influence in Lycia became stronger: Cities grew, Lycians began to build Greek-style rock tombs and create bilingual inscriptions.
Lycia defected from the League during the Peloponnesian War. In 429, Athens sent General Melasander to reconquer Lycia, but Gergis (Lyc. Kheriga) of Xanthus defeated him. Soon, Lycia reverted to Persian influence, and Xanthus was able to conquer Telmessus, Lycia's westernmost major city.
During the Revolt of the Satraps, Pericles, a king of the southeastern Limyra, declared himself king of Lycia and drove out the Xanthian ruler Arttum̃para. Pericles is regarded as the last king of Lycia. After the revolt failed, the land once again reverted to the empire.
Alexander the Great marched through Lycia in the winter of 334-333 in his campaign to capture coastal cities, which were of strategic importance during the Persian-Macedonian war. He appointed his general Nearchus as rule of Lycia and Pamphylia. Telmessus, Lycia's westernmost city, revolted in 333 but Nearchus quelled it easily enough.
In 329, Nearchus was temporarily relieved of his post to join Alexander's eastern campaign. What followed at the Partition of Babylon after Alexander's death is somewhat unclear: Diodorus and Arrian say that Lycia and Pamphylia were given to Antigonus, but Justin says that they were given to Nearchus. From the Partition of Triparadiscus onward they were definitely with Antigonus.
Lycia changed hands several times during the Wars of the Diadochi. It spent its longest period under the Ptolemies, from 275-197, when it was briefly taken by the Seleucids, and finally came under the Roman sphere of influence as a result of the Syrian War, 192-188.
I can find no clear indication of what became of native Lycian culture, but it is reasonable to suppose that it faded under Greek influence over the Hellenistic period. Thereafter the nation would only be a traditional and administrative name.
Language
Lycian belonged to the Luwian subgroup of Anatolian, a major Indo-European branch. It was distinct from the Luwian language and first appears in inscriptions during the Achaemenid period. Two dialects are known, standard Lycian or Lycian A, and Milyan. It was written in the Lycian alphabet, derived from Greek but with additional letters for its unique sounds. The last inscription in Lycian dates to about 300 BC.
Naturally, Greek was also spoken in the coastal cities and gradually replaced Lycian throughout the country.
Religion
According to Annick Payne, Lycian religion is known mainly from epitaphs referring to various deities. The most well-known is the "mother of the gods" (˜eni mahanahi), whom the Greeks identified with Leto (called L˜at˜ai in Lycian). The major sanctuary near Xanthus known as the Letoon, dating from the sixth century, may have originally belonged to the Lycian deity before she was conflated with Leto.
Likewise, most written sources identify native deities with Greek ones: Trqqas with Zeus and Maliya with Athena. The names of Padrita (Aphrodite) and Ertemi (Artemis, of whom the theophoric name Erttimeli was borne by a governor of Xanthus) appear to indicate adoption of the Greek goddesses by the Lycians rather than conflation. In the fourth century, Lycians began to worship Apollo as part and parcel with Leto and Artemis; he may have absorbed a minor god named Natri.
Due to the nature of the texts, not much is known about Lycian religious practice, but they appear to have favored altars cut into living rock rather than constructed ones.
Clothing
Unfortunately, native clothing appears is not well-attested in Lycian art; most anthropomorphic art comes from Greek-dominated areas and thus reflects Greek clothing styles. The chiton and himation appear frequently in royal tombs. Certain Persian elements are seen here and there, like the kidaris. The so-called Harpy Tomb from Xanthus, dating approximately to Xerxes' invasion, shows women's dress as being very finely draped with voluminous sleeves or caped uppers and plain, stiff-looking circlets.
Weapons
Herodotus says that the Lycians "wore cuirasses and greaves, and carried cornel-wood bows and unfeathered arrows and javelins; goat-skins hung from their shoulders, and they wore on their heads caps crowned with feathers; they also had daggers and scimitars (drepana)" (VII.92). I know this isn't good historical practice, but offhand I find it extremely difficult to believe that anyone used arrows that were not fletched.
Graeco-Lycian art shows military equipment that is pretty much Greek in appearance.
Labels:
arrows,
bow,
clothes,
clothing,
dagger,
history,
javelin,
lukka,
lycia,
lykia,
peoples of the empire,
weapons
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Peoples of the empire: The Cappadocians
Cappadocia (O.P. Katpatuka) lay between the Halys and northern Euphrates in central Anatolia. The region still goes by this name (Kapadokya in Turkish) for tourism purposes.
According to Herodotus, the Cappadocians are the people who were classically known to the Greeks as Syrians. This would seem to be the result of an excessively wide application of the name Syria, which is probably a Greek garbling of Assyria (which ruled the lands to the south of Cappadocia).
History
The land where Cappadocia later existed was the center of the great Hittite empire in the Bronze Age, but by the start of the Achaemenid period the Medes had already been ceded the land by the Lydian empire, when the Halys became the border between the Medes and Lydians. (As usual, it should be noted that we do not know how "imperial" the Medes actually were: The Cappadocians' subjection may have been only nominal.)
Cyrus the Great conquered Cappadocia in 547 BC, and Darius the Great placed them in the third tax district and imposed a yearly tax of 360 talents. At the Persepolis Apadana, the Cappadocians bear tribute consisting of a horse, coats and trousers. Ctesias refers to the first satrap of Cappadocia as Ariaramnes, a name shared by Darius' great-grandfather.
According to Herodotus, the Cappadocians in Xerxes' invasion of Greece served as infantry under Gobryas (Gaubaruva), Xerxes' half-brother by Darius (not to be confused with the Gobryas who helped place Darius on the throne). He does not mention them among the cavalry despite their historical connections with horse-rearing.
From the Anabasis of Xenophon, it is believed that by the time of Artaxerxes II southwestern Cappadocia was part of a satrapy called Greater Phrygia. In his reign, Cappadocia was administratively divided into Cappadocia and Paphlagonia.
According to the 1st-century BC Roman historian Cornelius Nepos, a Cappadocian satrap in the early 4th century, Datames, played a major part in imperial politics and war. Nepos describes Datames as a Carian, son of Camissares, satrap of Cilicia. Datames took part in the 385 invasion of Cadusia in northern Iran, where Camissares died. Afterward he put down several revolts, and King Artaxerxes II appointed him to lead the reconquest of Egypt, but court intrigue led to Datames relinquishing this appointment; it was taken up by Pharnabazus of Phrygia and failed in 373. Datames then joined the Revolt of the Satraps, and repeatedly defeated the royal armies sent against him. Cappadocia was in revolt from from 372-362, when Mithridates, son of fellow rebellious satrap Ariobarzanes of Phrygia, defected to the king, assassinated Datames and extradited his father to Artaxerxes.
Cappadocia was captured by Alexander the Great early in his invasion of the Persian empire. The last Achaemenid satrap, Mithrobuzanes, died during the Battle of the Granicus in 334. (However, Diodorus has an Ariamnes as satrap during this time; possibly they were satraps of different parts of Cappadocia). Alexander appointed a native Cappadocian, Abistamenes or (according to Arrian) Sabictas. However, his rule appears to have been tenuous; he ceases to appear in history after the Battle of Issus. Cappadocians fought as cavalry on the Achaemenid side at the Battle of Gaugamela in 332, under the command of Mazaeus, governor of Babylon.
After Alexander's death in 323, Macedonian general Perdiccas acted as regent for his young sons. In this role he gave the rule of Cappadocia and Paphlagonia to Eumenes, a high-ranking Greek general. Eumenes contended with Ariarathes I, a son of the aforementioned Ariamnes, who had seized power in 330. Perdiccas captured and killed Ariarathes, but was himself to fall in the Wars of the Diadochi, and Ariarathes' nephew Ariarathes II took central and northern Cappadocia to create a new kingdom with its seat at the already ancient city Mazaca (later Caesarea, Kayseri in Turkish).
Cappadocia was initially a tributary of the Seleucids and became independent in the 3rd century. Hellenistic influence was strong; the kings were of mixed Greek and Persian descent and used Ariarathes as a regnal name. During Roman expansion in the early 2nd century, Cappadocia first sided with the Seleucids, then with the Romans. Meddling by Mithridates VI of the nearby kingdom of Pontus led to the collapse of the Cappadocian dynasty in 96 BC. A new dynasty was founded by native noble Ariobarzanes I, but was highly unstable due to both competition from neighboring countries and its own shifting alliances with the Roman Triumvirates. In 41 BC, Marc Antony deposed Ariobarzanes' grandson Ariarathes IX and appointed as king Archelaus, the high priest of the Cappadocian city of Comana.
As a client of the Romans, Archelaus was compelled to go to Rome at the behest of Tiberius in AD 17, where he was accused of plotting rebellion. He died there, ostensibly of illness (Tacitus considers it possible that he committed suicide). Thereafter, Cappadocia became a Roman province, which it would remain under the Eastern Romans (Byzantines), Seljuks and Ottomans.
Language
Try as I might, I have yet to find anything at all regarding the Cappadocian language(s) during the Achaemenid period. A reasonable guess, however, might be a development of Hittite or Luwian, Indo-European languages of the Anatolian branch.
The language of Cappadocia in later centuries was a dialect of Greek, which is preserved today by those who were sent to Greece in the 1920s during the population exchange between Greece and Turkey.
Religion
Likewise I can learn little about this. Archelaus' home city, Comana, was sacred to the moon goddess Ma.
Clothing and arms
Clothing
In Persian art, the Cappadocians' clothing and hairstyles are much the same as the Medes, Persians and Armenians, including the tunics, footed trousers, shoes strapped around the ankle, and narrow, knotted sashes. They wear tiaras with the peaks laying to one side (which, as I have previously discussed, probably indicates a fine woven fabric - felt simply doesn't lie down like that) and the earflaps tied up at the back of the head, like a modern ushanka. Examples may be seen here (second photo up, center) and here.
The most notable difference is that rather than overcoats like the Medes, Cappadocians wear short-ish square cloaks, closed by bow-shaped fibulae at the shoulder. (In some images these fibulae appear to be ribbed and may resemble examples found at Deve Hüyük.)
Weapons
Herodotus describes Cappadocian equipment as "like the Paphlagonians," which in turn consisted of "woven helmets... small shields and short spears, and also javelins and daggers..." At Naqš-e Rostam the Cappadocian has an akinakes. On balance - considering, for example, the similar costumes - it seems plausible that Cappadocian arms were also similar to the Iranians'; they may, for example, have used crescent shields and daggers of the akinakes type, if not necessarily the particular Achaemenid style.
According to Herodotus, the Cappadocians are the people who were classically known to the Greeks as Syrians. This would seem to be the result of an excessively wide application of the name Syria, which is probably a Greek garbling of Assyria (which ruled the lands to the south of Cappadocia).
History
The land where Cappadocia later existed was the center of the great Hittite empire in the Bronze Age, but by the start of the Achaemenid period the Medes had already been ceded the land by the Lydian empire, when the Halys became the border between the Medes and Lydians. (As usual, it should be noted that we do not know how "imperial" the Medes actually were: The Cappadocians' subjection may have been only nominal.)
Cyrus the Great conquered Cappadocia in 547 BC, and Darius the Great placed them in the third tax district and imposed a yearly tax of 360 talents. At the Persepolis Apadana, the Cappadocians bear tribute consisting of a horse, coats and trousers. Ctesias refers to the first satrap of Cappadocia as Ariaramnes, a name shared by Darius' great-grandfather.
According to Herodotus, the Cappadocians in Xerxes' invasion of Greece served as infantry under Gobryas (Gaubaruva), Xerxes' half-brother by Darius (not to be confused with the Gobryas who helped place Darius on the throne). He does not mention them among the cavalry despite their historical connections with horse-rearing.
From the Anabasis of Xenophon, it is believed that by the time of Artaxerxes II southwestern Cappadocia was part of a satrapy called Greater Phrygia. In his reign, Cappadocia was administratively divided into Cappadocia and Paphlagonia.
According to the 1st-century BC Roman historian Cornelius Nepos, a Cappadocian satrap in the early 4th century, Datames, played a major part in imperial politics and war. Nepos describes Datames as a Carian, son of Camissares, satrap of Cilicia. Datames took part in the 385 invasion of Cadusia in northern Iran, where Camissares died. Afterward he put down several revolts, and King Artaxerxes II appointed him to lead the reconquest of Egypt, but court intrigue led to Datames relinquishing this appointment; it was taken up by Pharnabazus of Phrygia and failed in 373. Datames then joined the Revolt of the Satraps, and repeatedly defeated the royal armies sent against him. Cappadocia was in revolt from from 372-362, when Mithridates, son of fellow rebellious satrap Ariobarzanes of Phrygia, defected to the king, assassinated Datames and extradited his father to Artaxerxes.
Cappadocia was captured by Alexander the Great early in his invasion of the Persian empire. The last Achaemenid satrap, Mithrobuzanes, died during the Battle of the Granicus in 334. (However, Diodorus has an Ariamnes as satrap during this time; possibly they were satraps of different parts of Cappadocia). Alexander appointed a native Cappadocian, Abistamenes or (according to Arrian) Sabictas. However, his rule appears to have been tenuous; he ceases to appear in history after the Battle of Issus. Cappadocians fought as cavalry on the Achaemenid side at the Battle of Gaugamela in 332, under the command of Mazaeus, governor of Babylon.
After Alexander's death in 323, Macedonian general Perdiccas acted as regent for his young sons. In this role he gave the rule of Cappadocia and Paphlagonia to Eumenes, a high-ranking Greek general. Eumenes contended with Ariarathes I, a son of the aforementioned Ariamnes, who had seized power in 330. Perdiccas captured and killed Ariarathes, but was himself to fall in the Wars of the Diadochi, and Ariarathes' nephew Ariarathes II took central and northern Cappadocia to create a new kingdom with its seat at the already ancient city Mazaca (later Caesarea, Kayseri in Turkish).
Cappadocia was initially a tributary of the Seleucids and became independent in the 3rd century. Hellenistic influence was strong; the kings were of mixed Greek and Persian descent and used Ariarathes as a regnal name. During Roman expansion in the early 2nd century, Cappadocia first sided with the Seleucids, then with the Romans. Meddling by Mithridates VI of the nearby kingdom of Pontus led to the collapse of the Cappadocian dynasty in 96 BC. A new dynasty was founded by native noble Ariobarzanes I, but was highly unstable due to both competition from neighboring countries and its own shifting alliances with the Roman Triumvirates. In 41 BC, Marc Antony deposed Ariobarzanes' grandson Ariarathes IX and appointed as king Archelaus, the high priest of the Cappadocian city of Comana.
As a client of the Romans, Archelaus was compelled to go to Rome at the behest of Tiberius in AD 17, where he was accused of plotting rebellion. He died there, ostensibly of illness (Tacitus considers it possible that he committed suicide). Thereafter, Cappadocia became a Roman province, which it would remain under the Eastern Romans (Byzantines), Seljuks and Ottomans.
Language
Try as I might, I have yet to find anything at all regarding the Cappadocian language(s) during the Achaemenid period. A reasonable guess, however, might be a development of Hittite or Luwian, Indo-European languages of the Anatolian branch.
The language of Cappadocia in later centuries was a dialect of Greek, which is preserved today by those who were sent to Greece in the 1920s during the population exchange between Greece and Turkey.
Religion
Likewise I can learn little about this. Archelaus' home city, Comana, was sacred to the moon goddess Ma.
Clothing and arms
Clothing
In Persian art, the Cappadocians' clothing and hairstyles are much the same as the Medes, Persians and Armenians, including the tunics, footed trousers, shoes strapped around the ankle, and narrow, knotted sashes. They wear tiaras with the peaks laying to one side (which, as I have previously discussed, probably indicates a fine woven fabric - felt simply doesn't lie down like that) and the earflaps tied up at the back of the head, like a modern ushanka. Examples may be seen here (second photo up, center) and here.
The most notable difference is that rather than overcoats like the Medes, Cappadocians wear short-ish square cloaks, closed by bow-shaped fibulae at the shoulder. (In some images these fibulae appear to be ribbed and may resemble examples found at Deve Hüyük.)
Weapons
Herodotus describes Cappadocian equipment as "like the Paphlagonians," which in turn consisted of "woven helmets... small shields and short spears, and also javelins and daggers..." At Naqš-e Rostam the Cappadocian has an akinakes. On balance - considering, for example, the similar costumes - it seems plausible that Cappadocian arms were also similar to the Iranians'; they may, for example, have used crescent shields and daggers of the akinakes type, if not necessarily the particular Achaemenid style.
Labels:
akinaka,
akinakes,
anatolia,
archelaus,
ariarathes,
cappadocia,
cappadocians,
cloak,
dagger,
datames,
eumenes,
fibula,
gaubaruva,
gobryas,
history,
javelin,
katpatuka,
peoples of the empire,
spear
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Deve Hüyük: An Achaemenid graveyard
Shortly before World War I, Charles Woolley and T.E. Lawrence excavated a site in northern Syria: a graveyard for members of a Persian imperial garrison near the then-Assyrian city of Carchemish. The site yielded many goods that would have been used in war and day-to-day life by Iranian troops in the 6th-4th centuries BC. A gallery of finds may be viewed at the British Museum website. Sadly, the majority of items are unillustrated, but I'd like to highlight a few that may be useful for your living history projects:
A spearhead, in case you needed a reminder just how small these things could be, especially in comparison to modern repros.
A javelin head, looking surprisingly unlike a spearhead.
An akinakes. To this I would also add examples from Osprey's The Persian Army, also from Deve Hüyük. Note on all examples the plain iron hilts with guards and grips forged as one piece, and also the short, broad fuller on the longer Osprey example.
A fibula (cloak pin) which should be good for your Cappadocian impression. (Incidentally, Cappadocians are next week's Peoples of the Empire entry.)
A hand mirror. Well, everyone needs one sooner or later.
A bronze plate cover for the top end of a gorytos.
The various bronze bowls are also worth checking out, and if you're doing a cavalry impression, you'll want a snaffle bit of appropriate shape.
A spearhead, in case you needed a reminder just how small these things could be, especially in comparison to modern repros.
A javelin head, looking surprisingly unlike a spearhead.
An akinakes. To this I would also add examples from Osprey's The Persian Army, also from Deve Hüyük. Note on all examples the plain iron hilts with guards and grips forged as one piece, and also the short, broad fuller on the longer Osprey example.
A fibula (cloak pin) which should be good for your Cappadocian impression. (Incidentally, Cappadocians are next week's Peoples of the Empire entry.)
A hand mirror. Well, everyone needs one sooner or later.
A bronze plate cover for the top end of a gorytos.
The various bronze bowls are also worth checking out, and if you're doing a cavalry impression, you'll want a snaffle bit of appropriate shape.
Labels:
accessories,
achaemenid,
acinaces,
akenakes,
akinaka,
akinakes,
british museum,
brooch,
deve huyuk,
deve hüyük,
fibula,
gorytos,
gorytus,
javelin,
javelin head,
mirror,
spear,
spearhead,
syria
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









